Certified Independent
Laboratory Report
Proof
the Liquid Zeolite contains only trace amounts of Zeolite
Home
>
An
Actual Certified
Independent Laboratory Test Report Proving That Liquid Zeolite Contains
Only
Small Trace Amounts Of Zeolite
|
|
|
Dear
Friends of Zeolite,
Everyone
in the marketplace has been dealing with the
misinformation of facts about Zeolite from the liquid Zeolite MLM
company. I
don't know why I had not thought of this years before, but I decided to
get my
hands on 10 bottles of the MLM liquid Zeolite product in order to have
it
tested by an independent lab. The sample is called NCD2010. The lab
took ten
15ml bottles of the liquid Zeolite product and evaporated the liquid
out of it
in order to get down to the powder and test it. They air dried it to
make sure
that only water evaporated from the sample, leaving all other
ingredients
intact.
The
bottle claim is 24mg of Zeolite per serving and 100
servings per bottle.
Therefore,
there should be 2400mg per 15ml bottle. At ten
bottles, this should = 24000mg. As you can see by the lab report, after
the
liquid from 10 bottles were evaporated, they ended up with 2.3 grams
(2300mg)
of powder remnants (we haven't said that this was Zeolite yet). This is
less
than what is claimed in a single bottle. If you divide the 2300mg by 10
bottles, you get 230mg per bottle. When you divide that by the 100
doses that
they claim, you are getting only 2.3mg per serving instead of the 24mg
that
they claim.
Are
you still with me? I know, math is hard. So the lab
then took the powder and analyzed it to see what the purity of Zeolite
is. As
you can see, they came up with 67% pure. So this means that if there
are 230mg
of powder per bottle and it is only 67% Zeolite, you end up with
154.1mg of
Zeolite per bottle or a total of 1.5mg of Zeolite per dose compared to
the 24mg
per dose that they claim.
By
the way, for your viewing pleasure, the lab also gave
you the elemental breakdown of the liquid Zeolite, including the heavy
metal
levels. I remind you that making false label claims is against FDA
regulations
and against the law and puts all natural supplements under attack and
scrutiny
due to the bad example that these companies set for the supplement
industry as
a whole.
|
|
See
Lab Report Results below (or
image: page
1, page 2,
page
3)
|
|
Enclosed are the x-ray fluorescence (XRF) and x-ray diffraction (XRD)
analytical results for your sample, “NCD2010.”This
report will be mailed and emailed to you. The analyses will be charged
to the credit card number you provided.
The sample was received as ten small bottles of suspended material. The
material in the bottles was dumped into a container and air-dried
before grinding and analysis. The total weight of the air-dried
material was 2.3 gm. The dry sample was ground to approximately -400
mesh in a steel swing mill and then analyzed by our standard XRF
procedure for 31 major, minor and trace elements. The relative
precision/accuracy for this procedure is ~5-10% for major-minor
elements and ~10–15% for trace elements (those elements
listed in ppm) at levels greater than twice the detection limit in
samples of average geologic composition. A replicate sample and a
standard reference material ("SY4", a CANMET standard rock) were
analyzed with the sample to demonstrate analytical reproducibility for
your sample and analytical accuracy for a geologic standard,
respectively. The accepted ("known") values for the quality control
standard are listed with the XRF results.
A representative portion of the ground sample was packed into a
well-type plastic holder and then scanned with the diffractometer over
the range, 3-61° 22 using Cu-K" radiation. The ground sample
was also prepared as an oriented mount by mixing ground sample with
distilled water, drawing the mixture onto a cellulose acetate filter
and then rolling the deposited material onto a glass disk. The oriented
mount was scanned over the range 2-30°; treated with glycol and
then re-scanned over the range 2-22°. Analysis of oriented
mounts aids in the identification of clay minerals. The results of the
scans are summarized as approximate mineral weight percent
concentrations on the enclosed table. Estimates of mineral
concentrations were made using our XRF-determined elemental
compositions, the relative peak heights/areas on the XRD scans and
comparison to XRD data for zeolite standards. This sample appears to
contain “amorphous” (noncrystalline) material.
Amorphous material appears only as a broad elevation in the background
of the XRD scan so its composition cannot be determined and the
estimate of its concentration must be considered an “educated
guess” based on the difference between the total mineral
concentration and 100%. The detection limit for an average mineral in
this sample is ~1-3% and the analytical reproducibility is
approximately equal to the square root of the amount.
"Unidentified" accounts for that portion of the XRD scan which could
not be resolved and a “?” indicates doubt in both
mineral identification and amount.
Thank you for the opportunity to be of service.
|
December 14, 2010
- XRF Results for Sample, “NCD2010" Lab no. 210792
----------------------------------------------------- Wt %
------------------------------------------------
IDENT Na2O
MgO Al2O3 SiO2
P2O5
S
Cl K2O
CaO TiO2 MnO2
Fe2O3 BaO
SAMPLE 0.80 1.27
11.4 62.2
<0.05 <0.05
<0.02 2.57
2.53 0.25 0.03
2.00
0.04
Quality Control - Replicate (R) sample and standard reference material
(SY4) analyzed with sample
SAMPLE(R) 0.80 1.28
11.4 62.0
<0.05 <0.05
<0.02 2.56
2.53 0.25 0.03
2.00
0.04
SY4-XRF 6.37
0.73 21.5 49.2
0.14 <0.05
0.91 1.96
8.79 0.33
0.12 5.66
0.04
SY4-known 7.10 0.54
20.7 49.9
0.13
0.01 ----
1.66 8.05
0.29
0.14 6.21
0.04
|
-------------------------------------------------
PPM --------------------------------------------------
IDENT
V Cr
Co
Ni
W
Cu
Zn
As
Sn
Pb Mo
Sr
U
SAMPLE <10
14 <10
28
<10
13
69
28
<50 18
<10 554
22
Quality Control
SAMPLE(R) <10
13
<10
28
<10
13
69
27
<50
18
<10 562
20
SY4-XRF <10
11 <10
<10
18
<10
99
<20
<50 <10
<10 1198
24
SY4-known 8
12
3
9
--
7
93
<20 7
10
<10 1191
<20
|
---------------
PPM ------------
Ident
Th Nb
Zr
Rb
Y
SAMPLE 51
29
140 102
33
Quality Control
SAMPLE(R) 53
29
137
105
28
SY4-XRF 22
24
531 71
142
SY4-known <20
13
517
55
119
Initial
Date
Analysis Performed By The Mineral Lab, Inc
|
Mineral Name
Chemical Formula
Approx. Wt %
Clinoptilolite
(Na,K,Ca)6(Si,Al)36O72C20H2O
67
Smectite
(Ca,Na)x(Al,Mg,Fe)4(Si,Al)8O20(OH,F)4CnH2O
<10
K-feldspar
(K,Na)AlSi3O8
<10
Plagioclase feldspar
(Na,Ca)Al(Si,Al)3O8
<5?
“Amorphous”
?
<15
“Unidentified”
?
<5
|
| Check
the results below for yourself...
(SEE DISCLAIMER
BELOW) |
DISCLAIMER: Zeolite
HAS
NOT
been approved by the FDA
as a treatment for cancer or any specific disease. In addition, none of
the statements above have been evaluated by the FDA. All content
presented on www.zeolite.com
has been
compiled to provide information about Zeolite. Always consult
a
physician or board certified health practitioner before taking this
product. Use at your own risk.
UPDATE:The
FDA has listed Zeolite
on the GRAS
List (Generally
Recognized As Safe.)
|
|
BREAKING
NEWS!
More evidence micronized Zeolite
providing tangible proof of toxic
chemical removal.
|